The Greatness Of The "Worst" Video Game Movie Maker

He's one of the most hated men in movies. Critics pan his flicks. Audiences aren't having it. Gamers loathe him. Heck, a chewing gum maker even wanted him to retire. But is it possible that we've all been wrong?

This year, Prince of Persia was supposed to be the big Hollywood film that got gaming right. It didn't deliver, and 2010 was another year bereft of the elusive great gaming flick. As gaming movies continue to let us down, maybe it's time to consider that the worst offender in all this might not be the worst offender after all. It is time to re-assess the king of hated video game movies, Uwe Boll.

The German-born Boll made his splash in the early part of the last decade with House of the Dead, a cinematic take on the Sega arcade games. Low budget and corny, it was the film that would cement his reputation in the West as a maker of low-budget game-inspired schlock.

"I have almost no time to play video games," Boll tells Kotaku from the set of his current production In the Name of the King 2. According to Boll, The House of the Dead film version came via Mark Altman , the film scribe and producer behind DOA: Dead or Alive .

<!-- videoId: F_dmvG9QM8U --> newVideoPlayer( {"type":"video","player":"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/F_dmvG9QM8U&hl=en&fs=1&hd=1","customParams":[],"width":500,"height":332.5,"ratio":0.615,"flashData":"","embedName":null,"objectId":null,"noEmbed":false,"source":"youtube","wrap":true,"agegate":false} ); <!-- /videoId: F_dmvG9QM8U -->

Boll thought he'd made the most accurate House of the Dead film send-up possible, and Sega supported the picture with then Sega of America exec Peter Moore given a zombie cameo. The movie's reviews were brutal, but the movie turned a profit. "Because it made money I went deeper into the gaming world and tried to acquire games I like — for example Alone In The Dark or BloodRayne," Boll says.

Alone in the Dark didn't fair much better with Alone in the Dark's scriptwriter dishing on the changes Boll made to the film and the game's developer deciding not to make this film a tie-in for the then-upcoming Alone in the Dark 5. The movie was not a success with critics or at the box office. BloodRayne , which had a budget of $25 million only made $3 million at theaters. Critics hated it. This is where the career of any normal filmmaker would draw to a close. Uwe Boll is not any normal filmmaker, because Boll produced sequels of both: BloodRayne 2 in 2007 and Alone in the Dark II in 2008.

This is Boll's genius — he is able to get his films made. Even when critics tear into his pictures, there he is with yet another film. He's used German tax loopholes to get his films financed as well as good old fashioned pre-sales, private investors and subsidies. Boll might not be the greatest film director, but he is a great movie producer. Since 2002, he's made over fifteen films. "I've never made more than three movies in a year, and I only did that twice," he says. "Normally I do two movies a year. Three is too much." Here's a guy who filmed three movies back to back, all using Nazi uniforms, props and settings and all completely different. His work ethic and corner-cutting harkens back to the bygone days when directors pumped out films year after year, rather then leaving them to languish in development hell. When asked whether he'll continue making films into old age, the 45-year-old director replies, "I don't think i will make movies