AI Use Concerns: Clarification

Regarding AI Accusations in Crime Scene Cleaner

Recently, we’ve been getting lots of negative reviews claiming that our game uses AI-generated content. We’ve been responding, clarifying, and explaining this wherever possible – but these claims have grown to a point where we feel the need to address it clearly in one place. So let’s state this as plainly as we can:

We do NOT use AI-generated art, dialogue, or voices in our game.

Our assets are either created by our artists or come from legally purchased sources (such as the Unity Asset Store and stock photo libraries). This is a completely standard practice in game development, especially for smaller teams. When selecting external assets, we select them under the assumption that they are not AI-generated and we do our best to verify them.

That said, we also want to be honest. We do our best to verify them, but nowadays distinguishing AI from human-made art can be hard. There is always a small chance that something could slip through unintentionally. And that’s exactly why we are open to investigating any concerns.

If you have doubts about a specific asset, please report it to us.

The best way to do that is via our Discord, directly to our Community Manager. We will investigate it, and if there is any real indication that something might be AI-generated, we will replace it. We do not want AI-generated content in our game.

Remember: intuition can be missleading.

However, it’s important to highlight something. Many of the assets most frequently accused of being AI – such as the pizzeria logo, paintings shown in community updates, the cleaning lady, or even the voices – have already been thoroughly investigated and proven not to be AI. In many cases, they were either created entirely by our artists or come from sources that predate the rise of generative AI.

This is why we ask you to keep in mind that intuition can be misleading.

Your voice matters.

We have absolutely no problem with people raising concerns. Please, report anything that looks suspicious to you, we genuinely appreciate that. But what is exhausting and frustrating is seeing negative reviews that confidently claim we are lying, or that something is “100% AI” or “AI slop” or “It’s not rocket science to tell that this is AI”, without any evidence. Even when we provide clear explanations. It’s especially disheartening when, for example, we have credited voice actors, refer directly to them (hey, you can probably easily hire them yourselves!), and still see claims that all voices are AI-generated. It spreads disinformation.

Backlash against AI can easily turn into backlash against actual artist.

This situation is deeply unfair to our artists, who are the ones most affected by these accusations. These are real people who work hard to create the assets you see in the game. At this point, it feels like the backlash against AI is starting to turn into backlash against actual artists.

Remember: AI detection tools are not reliable.

They frequently mislabel real, human-made artwork as AI-generated. This shouldn’t be surprising, as AI models are trained on human-created works, so naturally, similarities exist.

What is photobashing?

Lastly, we want to explain a technique that is often misunderstood — photobashing. Photobashing is a well-established artistic technique that involves combining and manipulating photographs to create a final image. It has been used long before AI existed. In fact, photomontage as a